<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World&#8217;s First Solar-powered Ship by Nippon Yusen KK and Nippon Oil Corp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenpacks.org/2008/08/29/worlds-first-solar-powered-ship-by-nippon-yusen-kk-and-nippon-oil-corp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenpacks.org/2008/08/29/worlds-first-solar-powered-ship-by-nippon-yusen-kk-and-nippon-oil-corp/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:17:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.greenpacks.org/2008/08/29/worlds-first-solar-powered-ship-by-nippon-yusen-kk-and-nippon-oil-corp/comment-page-1/#comment-1344</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenpacks.org/?p=934#comment-1344</guid>
		<description>Of course, 6.5% of the fuel they use would come out to more than $1.4 million per year.  Although it will cost money to install, it will save money in the long run.  And in business terms, one year is not a very long run at all.  Most businesses would be happy to see a return on an investment after 5 or 10 years.

The purpose of commercialising it is to make it easier to convince ship owners to fit the solar panel system to their cargo ships.  The money they make will be a nice bonus but the environmental impact will be more important (at least to me).

I&#039;m sure you&#039;re already aware of the kite-powered cargo ships that save 30 - 50% of their fuel with an enormous kite that is automatically deployed from the bow of the ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, 6.5% of the fuel they use would come out to more than $1.4 million per year.  Although it will cost money to install, it will save money in the long run.  And in business terms, one year is not a very long run at all.  Most businesses would be happy to see a return on an investment after 5 or 10 years.</p>
<p>The purpose of commercialising it is to make it easier to convince ship owners to fit the solar panel system to their cargo ships.  The money they make will be a nice bonus but the environmental impact will be more important (at least to me).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re already aware of the kite-powered cargo ships that save 30 &#8211; 50% of their fuel with an enormous kite that is automatically deployed from the bow of the ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
